October202014
2PM

Love without Sex

tamorapierce:

mild-madness:

I’m doing a Philosophy paper on Asexuality. Please reblog if you think Love without Sex is possible! I really need the data. Like if you think love has to have sex.

Abelard and Heloise.

Older couples who aren’t into drugs. 

12PM
cecilyjeanne:

stunningpicture:

Moving out of the apartment

This is, without a doubt, the saddest photo I have ever seen in my ENTIRE LIFE.

cecilyjeanne:

stunningpicture:

Moving out of the apartment

This is, without a doubt, the saddest photo I have ever seen in my ENTIRE LIFE.

(via minuiko)

11AM

asheathes:

Do you ever hate yourself for reading a good book too quickly because you always feel overly nostalgic about it once you’re done because your time in that world passed by too quickly

11AM

fytortall:

boldly-going-to-hell:

i’d like to thank god and also jesus for tamora pierce

Amen.

11AM

thefingerfuckingfemalefury:

bert-and-ernie-are-gay:

kluckleberry:

#while bbc sherlock is at the stage where sherlock and john are finally discovering their love for each other #the movies have flown straight past flirting and into husband land

Interviewer: Tell us about your relationship with Robert Downey Jr on set.
Jude Law: Oh, I love him. I love him.
Interviewer: Yeah? You had a bit of a bromance going on there.
Jude Law: What is this new term everyone is using?
Interviewer: Bromance?
Jude Law: Oh, it’s a horrible term. What about just a romance?
Interviewer: No, it’s not the same.
Jude Law: Why not? Why?
Interviewer: Cause then you’d have to star in a romantic comedy together or something.
Jude Law: We just have. Have you not seen it? [x]

Jude Law does not have time for any of that ‘No Homo’ bullshit…

(Source: funkes, via thorshelper)

October192014

ravenclaw-wit:

An attractive guy on the bus smiled at me this morning, so obviously I accidentally elbowed him in the head when I was getting off at my stop. This is flirting. This is how it’s done. 

9PM
cravist:


explisist:

bitterarab:

Damn.

*standing ovation*

THIS

cravist:

explisist:

bitterarab:

Damn.

*standing ovation*

THIS

(via jeong-jeong)

7PM
“I asked my ex, now good friend, if she would ever have an open relationship and she said, “No, I don’t think I could do that” then after a pause and a smile, “but what about love affair friendships?” She went on to describe an impenetrable fortress of female friendship, her own group of best mates who’d known each other since school and had supported and loved each other through almost all of their lifetimes. They sounded far more bonded to, and in love with one another, than their respective husbands. It struck me that we don’t have the language to reflect the diversity and breadth of connections we experience. Why is sex the thing we tend to define a relationship by, when in fact it can be simple casual fun without a deep emotional transaction? Why do we say “just friends” when, for some of us, a friendship goes deeper? Can we define a new currency of commitment that celebrates and values this? Instead of having multiple confusing interpretations of the same word, could we have different words? What if we viewed our relationships as a pyramid structure with our primary partner at the top and a host of lovers, friends, spiritual soul mates, colleagues, and acquaintances beneath that?” Rosie Wilby, “You’re More Polyamorous Than You Think” (via foutue)

(Source: sodisarmingdarling, via gabydunn)

7PM

it is soon

keristars:

are your feels ready
do you have your reading bunker planned

because Wild Rover No More is out in 2 weeks

(amzn pre-order - currently at $14.21 hardcover)

(via soldier-sailor-mermaid-spy)

← Older entries Page 1 of 700